h1

Russian arms manufacturer Almaz-Antey delivers MH17 report

October 13, 2015

Live gestreamd op 13 okt. 2015

Russian arms manufacturer Almaz-Antey is presenting the results of its probe into the alleged missile launch that may have downed the MH17 Malaysian Airlines plane over eastern Ukraine, July 17, 2014. (from 11:17)

Uploaded by RT

Russian Arms Manufacturer Almaz-Antey Delivers MH17 Report [ft. Analysis and Observations]

(excerpt)

These tests clearly refuted the ‘Russian supplied BUK missile’ hypothesis for the shoot-down, showing that if that type of missile (BUK-M1) hit at the angles observed in the wreckage of MH17, the damage should have been greater (1:03) and many distinctive ‘butterfly’ holes would have been present. Such holes were not observed. The presenters believed that only an older type of BUK missile, not used by Russia, may have been used.

It is more likely, considering the lack of penetrative power of fragments in the MH17 debris, that another type of smaller missile was the candidate for the incident – perhaps an air-to-air weapon since military jets were seen by witnesses at the time of the attack.

The Dutch Safety Board presentation regarding this same incident (30 min video below) was extremely light on forensics (although they concur with the Russians on the location of the missile). They did feature butterfly fragments allegedly taken out of some victims, but the question is, where are the butterfly patterns on the skin of the aircraft? The distinctive patterning seen in the Russian test was nowhere to be found.

Also, this Dutch presentation says there were no other aircraft on radar at the time of the incident, to rule out an air-to-air missile, whereas the Russians showed there were fighter sized targets on their scopes -backing up the witness reports that appeared in the BBC Russia news story (see the above video). And the Russians requested the US release their satellite images of the crime scene and Washington refused. The US satellite was right overhead at the time.

We must remember that the Ukrainians, suspects in this crime, were party to the investigation. And regardless of whether or not you think Governments could lie about such things, we do have the problem of the forensic evidence. It doesn’t matter what you assume – we have a fundamental issue with the raw data when it comes to the western account of what happened.

Advertisements

6 comments

  1. Plaats hem hier ook nog maar even:

    http://www.whathappenedtoflightmh17.com/long-list-of-indications-showing-the-dutch-are-not-very-keen-in-finding-mh17-truth/


  2. http://www.zaplog.nl/zaplog/article/hoe_goed_is_het_associatieverdrag_eigenlijk_gelezen



Comments are closed.

KaTe's Kids KoVe

Stand In Truth

mynameisjoecortina

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Video Rebel's Blog

Just another WordPress.com site

Activist Post

het einde

2012 The Awakening

A resource for all souls on the journey toward building a New Earth!!

The Extinction Protocol

Geologic and Earthchange News events

%d bloggers like this: